In order to properly examine Apple's critical analysis of the growing power of conservative movements in educational policy and practice, as a class we should be mindful of both sides to every issue. For example, Apple has provided us with two distinct groups, the neoliberals, who are committed to markets and freedom of individuals, while neoconservatives are committed to discipline and traditional polices for education. This is the group that us as teachers debate constantly is the belief in standards and high stakes testing. In additon, the latter group centers around authoritarian policies which very often include religion. I believe it is difficult as a very reformed Jewish person to relate to an explanation of the world of education can be defined only using the Bible and the idea that "it is necessary to turn our lives over to God". In chapter one, Apple does an excellent job in presenting both sides of the argument. Another means of questioning concerns examining the former educational policies, the current educational policies and finally the future. Therefore, I believe that discussing the current educational system and the future of education. "Dwelling" on past educational systems, such as those during colonial times, proves to be "unimportant" since so many changes have been made since that time. The only reason to study past educational policies is to support the neoconservatives belief that religion has a place in education. In addition, I believe based on our individual belief systems concerning educational practices and policies may be vastly different, therefore as a class we must be mindful of views different from our own. Viewing education as a "business" may be a difficult task for some of us and whenever policies (educational and otherwise) are linked with politics, messy differing thoughts can arise, and eventually turning into a hot debate. My mom always told me there are three things you do not discuss with people and the first was always politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment